|
Comparable virologic response and in vitro susceptibility to darunavir in patients infected with subtype B and non-subtype B HIV isolates participating in the ARTEMIS Phase III Trial
I. Dierynck1, S. De Meyer1, E. Lathouwers1, C. Vanden Abeele1, T. Van De Casteele1, R. DeMasi2, A. Hill3, S. Spinosa-Guzman1, M.-P. de Béthune1, G. Picchio2
1Tibotec BVBA, Mechelen, Belgium, 2Tibotec Inc, Yardley, United States, 3University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Background: ARTEMIS is an ongoing Phase III study assessing efficacy and safety of darunavir with low-dose ritonavir (DRV/r) versus lopinavir with low-dose ritonavir (LPV/r) in treatment-naïve patients. In the primary Week 48 analysis, DRV/r achieved a virologic response (VL<50 copies/mL) of 84% versus 78% for LPV/r. Effect of HIV-1 subtype on virological response and in-vitro susceptibility to DRV was studied in this trial. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive DRV/r 800/100mg once-daily or lopinavir/r 800/200mg total daily dose, plus a fixed background regimen (TDF and FTC). Genotyping, subtype determination, and phenotyping (Antivirogram) were performed by Virco. Results: Most patients (61%) harbored HIV-1 subtype B; other prevalent subtypes found were subtype C (13%) and CRF01_AE (17%); 9% harbored other subtypes. Baseline VL and CD4 counts were similar between subgroups. Virologic responses in subgroups and treatment arms are summarized (Table):
| | | VL<50 copies/mL at Week 48 n/N (%) | | | | N | DRV/r | LPV/r | Difference in response DRV/r−LPV/r % (95% CI) | | Overall (ITT-TLOVR) | 689 | 287/343 (84) | 271/346 (78) | 5 (−0.5, 11.2) | | HIV-1 subtype | | B | 418 | 171/210 (81) | 162/208 (78) | 4 (−4.2; 11.3) | | C | 89 | 34/39 (87) | 41/50 (82) | 5 (−10.2; 20.6) | | CRF01_AE | 117 | 53/62 (85) | 45/55 (82) | 4 (-9.8; 17.2) | In the DRV arm, the difference [95% CI] in response among patients with subtype C and CRF01_AE versus subtype B infection was 6% [−7.3; 18.8] and 4% [−6.8; 14.9], respectively. Median EC50 values (range) for DRV were similar for subtype C (1.12 nM [0.23-3.46]) and subtype CRF01_AE (1.27 nM [0.35-4.30]) compared to subtype B (1.79 nM [0.38-5.07]) HIV-1 isolates. Conclusions: In ARTEMIS, once-daily DRV/r treatment was equally effective, irrespective of HIV-1 subtype confirming the broad activity of DRV/r. Accordingly, in vitro susceptibility to DRV was comparable across the HIV-1 subtypes studied.
|