Financing for Sustainable National Health Care  WESS04

Organiser:
Type:
Special Session Back
Venue: SR 11 (1400)
Interpretation: None
Time: 12:45 - 14:15, 06.08.2008
Code: WESS04
Moderator: Alan Whiteside, South Africa


Click here to see a webcast of this session on kaisernetwork.org

This special session will explore various models of health care financing at national levels and will also discuss donor approaches working in partnership with resource-limited governments and civil society.

Many countries facing a financial burden of HIV/AIDS not only critically depend on external assistance for scale up of national programmes, but have yet to put in place systems to mobilize predictable and sustainable domestic resources for HIV/AIDS or for broader health care programmes. Increased resources for AIDS, through the Global Fund, PEPFAR, other bilateral aid programmes and private foundations are enabling expansion in countries of HIV-specific prevention and treatment interventions. Also infrastructure, human resources, commodities management and distribution, research and evaluation that can contribute to overall health systems strengthening. A number of initiatives from within resource-limited countries themselves, as well as donor-driven initiatives aim to address the issue of social health protection broadly and national health care financing specifically.

This session will examine country case studies and an analysis of the 2006 reforms in the Dutch health insurance scheme for the working poor, the Mexico social health programme, and the International Health Partnership initiated by the United Kingdom.



Presentations in this session:

12:45
WESS0401
Powerpoint (1.05 MB)
Breaking the Deadlock Using Private Health Insurance Schemes
Chris van der Vorm, Netherlands


13:00
WESS0402
Powerpoint (282 KB)
The International Health Partnership
Carissa Etienne, Switzerland


13:15
WESS0403
The Mexico social health programme
Mauricio Hernàndez-Avila, Mexico


13:30
WESS0404
National health care in China
Guang Shi, China


13:45
WESS0405
Powerpoint (605 KB)
National health care in Rwanda
Daniel Ngamije, Rwanda


14:00
WESS0406
Powerpoint (103 KB)
Equity in national health care
Susan Cleary, South Africa








Rapporteur report

Track E report by Mandeep Dhaliwal

Presentations of objectives of aspirational donor interventions, promotion of national health system strengthening efforts, and dichotomy of successful and equitable UA to ART scale up with one that underlines mass social inequity.

 

IHP+ aims to enhance coordination to achieve health MDGs through harmonised in country effort.  Building on existing structured to provide results orientated finance

Raising expectation for more predictable funding.  Difficulties in disconnect between international agency and bilateral central offices and country staff and concerns that CS at country level are not supported to engage in compact negotiation.

 

National health care scale up in China due in great part to GDP growth. Average life expectancy expanded.  5 years ago only 30% had social health insurance now 80%. Total health expenditure 5% of GDP. SARS cost and lessons learned on access and equity.  Vision for health reform in China acknowledges health is a fundamental human right.

 

Rwanda experience of operating Community Based Health trust operates at:

Sector level – voluntary contribution of the population

District level – critical for function pooled risk

National level – MOH 13% of budget; public and private insurance  

83% on Community Health Insurance  

55% are paying with their own money

Impact increased uptake of systems, improvements in MH.

 

Mexico is a good model of management of state financed ART scale up. 37% of population uninsured but 98% PLWH insured. UA to ART. Challenges for stability: inefficient planning and purchasing; poor link with prevention and other health promotion programmes.  Need clear advice from international orgs for price based on GDP and allow public  finance of high speciality service. Need to use international procurement efforts for generics but pharma has blocked access.

 

Debates in South Africa about the response to AIDS have diverted crucial energy from key task of combating the epidemic.   Massively unequal access to health care with rich people paying into private system. To reach the national UA targets will require one third of the financing of the global response to AIDS.  Could be mitigated if they could draw 

on the entire health system but can only rely on a third of it – the chronically underfunded public system. Health system is a social institution and levels of inequity demonstrate lack of solidarity.




   

   

    The organizers reserve the right to amend the programme.


Copyright Notice © IAS Disclaimer